Date of Original Version

7-2003

Type

Working Paper

Rights Management

All Rights Reserved

Abstract or Description

A sizeable fraction of recent research on monetary policy has been concerned with issues relating to analytical “indeterminacies”—i.e. multiple solutions in rational expectations (RE) models. Most of the literature features sophisticated RE analysis conducted within dynamic models that reflect optimizing behavior by individual agents and incorporate Taylor-style policy rules. A few papers have suggested that some of the particular indeterminacy arguments are misleading or irrelevant. For the most part, however, there has been little dissent from the position that these indeterminacies present a genuine problem for monetary policy makers. The purpose of the present paper, by contrast, is to argue that conclusions based on multiple-solution indeterminacy findings are of dubious merit rather generally.

DOI

10.1016/S0304-3932(03)00061-8

Share

COinS
 

Published In

Journal of Monetary Economics , 50, 5, 1153-1175.