Date of Original Version

6-2006

Type

Conference Proceeding

Rights Management

Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. To copy otherwise, to republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee.

Abstract or Description

In multiagent systems, strategic settings are often analyzed under the assumption that the players choose their strategies simultaneously. However, this model is not always realistic. In many settings, one player is able to commit to a strategy before the other player makes a decision. Such models
are synonymously referred to as leadership, commitment, or Stackelberg models, and optimal play in such models is often signicantly different from optimal play in the model where strategies are selected simultaneously.

The recent surge in interest in computing game-theoretic solutions has so far ignored leadership models (with the exception of the interest in mechanism design, where the designer is implicitly in a leadership position). In this paper, we study how to compute optimal strategies to commit to under both commitment to pure strategies and commitment to mixed strategies, in both normal-form and Bayesian games. We give both positive results (e±cient algorithms) and negative results (NP-hardness results).

Share

COinS
 

Published In

Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce (EC)..